The Dysfunctional Family in Brontë’s Wuthering Heights Essay -- Wuther

The Dysfunctional Family in Brontà «Ã¢â‚¬â„¢s Wuthering Heights Creating a haven from the cruel outside world, families ideally provide protection and support for each of their members. In Emily Brontà «Ã¢â‚¬â„¢s Wuthering Heights, however, bitterness grows between the Earnshaws and the Lintons. Within these two families, siblings rival for power and parents fail to fulfill their roles as caregivers. The intertwining relationships of the Earnshaws and the Lintons are marked by physical abuse, degradation, and emotional negligence. These reduce each of the family members’ life to a lonely and meaningless journey though the cold and misty moors. Unforgiving as the moors that surround them, the Earnshaws and the Lintons often resort to physical violence when interacting with one another. When Lockwood first visits the protagonist Heathcliff at Wuthering Heights, he tries to caress one of Heathcliff’s dogs but is met with angry snarls. Heathcliff, seeing this, kicks the dog and informs his visitor: â€Å"You’d better let the dog alone. She’s not accustomed to be spoiled – not kept for a pet†(12). Like Heathcliff’s dog, no one in the Earnshaw or the Linton family is accustomed to affection. Nelly, the servant who has worked for the Earnshaws and the Lintons for many years, is considered to be a part of these two families. She has grown so accustomed to her master Hindley Earnshaw’s physical violence that she is unfazed when he sticks a knife between her teeth. Hindley tries to use physical violence as a means of re-establishing his power within his household, for he has lost his stranglehold on it when he spiralled into depression over his wife Frances’ death. An alcoholic and a gambler, Hindley is unsuccessful in obtaining his son Hareton’s a... ...s purposes. When Edgar Linton marries his beloved Catherine, Heathcliff revenges on his adoptive brother-in-law by marrying Isabella so that he may inherit the family fortune. He is only playing a game of emotions though, for he does not love Isabella at all. As Isabella laments to Nelly of her husband Heathcliff: â€Å"I gave him my heart, and he took and pinched it to death, and flung it back to me† (168). Cruel and false, the Earnshaws and the Lintons wreck havoc with each other’s hearts. They abuse each other physically, degrade their children, and withhold affection. The family structure collapses as the spirit is crushed. These two families banish the warmth of love and care from their midst and embrace the coldness of the still, harsh moors between their two houses. WORK CITED Brontà «, Emily. Wuthering Heights. New York: New American Library, 1959. The Dysfunctional Family in Brontà «Ã¢â‚¬â„¢s Wuthering Heights Essay -- Wuther The Dysfunctional Family in Brontà «Ã¢â‚¬â„¢s Wuthering Heights Creating a haven from the cruel outside world, families ideally provide protection and support for each of their members. In Emily Brontà «Ã¢â‚¬â„¢s Wuthering Heights, however, bitterness grows between the Earnshaws and the Lintons. Within these two families, siblings rival for power and parents fail to fulfill their roles as caregivers. The intertwining relationships of the Earnshaws and the Lintons are marked by physical abuse, degradation, and emotional negligence. These reduce each of the family members’ life to a lonely and meaningless journey though the cold and misty moors. Unforgiving as the moors that surround them, the Earnshaws and the Lintons often resort to physical violence when interacting with one another. When Lockwood first visits the protagonist Heathcliff at Wuthering Heights, he tries to caress one of Heathcliff’s dogs but is met with angry snarls. Heathcliff, seeing this, kicks the dog and informs his visitor: â€Å"You’d better let the dog alone. She’s not accustomed to be spoiled – not kept for a pet†(12). Like Heathcliff’s dog, no one in the Earnshaw or the Linton family is accustomed to affection. Nelly, the servant who has worked for the Earnshaws and the Lintons for many years, is considered to be a part of these two families. She has grown so accustomed to her master Hindley Earnshaw’s physical violence that she is unfazed when he sticks a knife between her teeth. Hindley tries to use physical violence as a means of re-establishing his power within his household, for he has lost his stranglehold on it when he spiralled into depression over his wife Frances’ death. An alcoholic and a gambler, Hindley is unsuccessful in obtaining his son Hareton’s a... ...s purposes. When Edgar Linton marries his beloved Catherine, Heathcliff revenges on his adoptive brother-in-law by marrying Isabella so that he may inherit the family fortune. He is only playing a game of emotions though, for he does not love Isabella at all. As Isabella laments to Nelly of her husband Heathcliff: â€Å"I gave him my heart, and he took and pinched it to death, and flung it back to me† (168). Cruel and false, the Earnshaws and the Lintons wreck havoc with each other’s hearts. They abuse each other physically, degrade their children, and withhold affection. The family structure collapses as the spirit is crushed. These two families banish the warmth of love and care from their midst and embrace the coldness of the still, harsh moors between their two houses. WORK CITED Brontà «, Emily. Wuthering Heights. New York: New American Library, 1959.

Image Of Pakistan Word Fmt

Mostly, we protest against the wrong image of Pakistan portrayed in the world and international media. But if we judge ourselves in the same balance as other holds, it will become clear, without any doubt, that the Image the world holds of us is actually the right one. We were not born the hatred. We our self are the true butchers and barbarians and our actions presents it well. We act than we think, I'm sorry I don't mean it, because we just act and act, why should we think when we know that our state is down enough, and can easily handle this havoc and loss. Oral think, we are just a crowd of illiterate avengers.And sorry to say, yes we are. Must mention one most tragic event here, A few months ago a short-film was released on internet which was said to be anti-lilacs, and it hurt the global community Of Muslims. I hate that movie as, much as any of a Muslim will, But what did our people did? They went violent on the streets of Pakistan. An anti;lilacs film, wonder how it justify b urning a cinema down to ashes in Appeaser. But then we came to know that it was released on internet, Thanks God internet is safe and can't b urn, other wise the world would be downloading ashes on their desktop.We starts a protest in peaceful manner. Butts said we starts, the way we end up with is extremely horrible. We are very precise in sealing all the roads and passages around. We love to barb all the public transport not only public but also private vehicles which are owned by someone Pakistani and most probably a Muslim. Its not done yet, we don't even spare our street lights and traffic signals, because street light wastes electricity and we already lack it, and for traffic signals every one knows we don't bother them. How can we defend our Prophet (PUB) by torching and firing our own homeland, what just happened?Damage to property and loss of life caused to the peoples who had just nothing to do with it, what about them? Did their sacrifice just save the day ? No, we need t o think of our self and our behavior. We are intended to do exactly opposite to the thing which it need to be done. For example if there is a signboard saying please don't look on the back of this board then every person will, no matter hoe busy he is will make some time to inspect the back side of the road. So, now some one can exactly guess our actions at any appeal. What exactly are we? Admit that we look exactly like Humans, but do we act like humans? Do we have humanity? Do we care if, what would any other nation will think about us? We must not blame our Government because a government is only a reflection of people. We must put ourselves into effort.

Comparative Critique of Kennans American Diplomacy and...

The works of William Appleman Williams and George F. Kennan have contributed to understanding of American diplomatic history during the period of 1900-1950. Kennans book, American Diplomacy, offers a sharp critique with its focus on American mistakes, specifically examining the absence of direction in American foreign policy and with the end result of American strength and insecurity at the start of the Cold War. Williams, in his book The Tragedy of American Diplomacy, pursues a different but still critical perspective by asserting that American policy was largely motivated by the Open Door policy, which led to the eventual alienation of countries to the United States and ultimately created the Cold War. By analyzing these two†¦show more content†¦The Open Door policy of John Hay was established to acknowledge equal rights of nations to economic opportunities in China. Kennan questions the importance of the Open Door policy, stating that it resulted in hardly any percept ible practical effect. The United States was not even willing to enforce its views. The authors final criticism of the futility of this policy is that America would not adhere to it with regards to Puerto Rico and the Philippines, both of which possessed strict restrictions against foreign commerce. The only utility of the Open Door policy was this it was an idealistic device that created domestic admiration for the Administration. Despite its ineffectiveness, it did place a burden on America to uphold its principles. In promoting the equal access to trade in China, the United States would call upon foreign powers to acknowledge the Open Door policy, each time drawing a reluctant acknowledgement. The very nature of the Open Door policy resided on vague concepts that did not incorporate the realities of foreign entrenchment in China or the fact that China did not conform to the standard of a modern nation-state. This correlated into perceived diplomatic achievements by the American people, and also served as a threat to some of the powers, namely Japan, that held vital